FeedbackIf you find a bug, or have feedback, put it here. Please no job applications in here, click Apply on the job instead.Thanks for the message! We will get back to you soon.

[Spam check] What is the name of Elon Musk's company going to Mars?

Send feedback
Open Startup
RSS
API
Health InsurancePost a job

find a remote job
work from anywhere

πŸ‘‰ Hiring for a Remote position?

Post a job
on the πŸ† #1 Remote Jobs board

Remote Health by SafetyWing


Global health insurance for freelancers & remote workers

CCI


closed

dev

 

ruby

 

rails

 

scrum

This job post is closed and the position is probably filled. Please do not apply.
\nCCI Systems, Inc. is seeking a Software Developer with hands-on front and/or back end web application design and development experience. The successful candidate will be part of a team that allows working remotely, provides a flexible schedule, and where management does a good job of defining and prioritizing work for the team in an agile Ruby-on-Rails development environment with 1-week or 2-week iterations. The job includes working closely with a small specialized team of: Developers, Business Analysts, and Production Support.\n\n\nDuties and Responsibilities:\n\n\n* Design and develop core applications for our business (SaaS).\n\n* Work with other talented engineers to solve real world business and technical problems.\n\n* Architect, build, test, document, and ship code.\n\n* Design, implement, build, and utilize RESTful APIs.\n\n* Use test-driven development techniques to ensure that your code works.\n\n* Respond to and resolve questions and issues logged by users of a live system.\n\n* Collaboratively design and build new features.\n\n* Develop functional prototypes that highlight new design concepts.\n\n* Seek out new technologies to better solve problems.\n\n* Practice agile development methods (scrum, XP).\n\n\n


See more jobs at CCI

# How do you apply?\n\n This job post is older than 30 days and the position is probably filled. Try applying to jobs posted recently instead.
108ms